Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Sleep & recovery
Research brief

Closed-loop auditory stimulation and sleep oscillations in healthy older adults

In 16 healthy adults aged 60 and over, closed-loop auditory stimulation increased several NREM sleep oscillations without changing sleep architecture; word-pair recall did not improve at group level, but individual increases in fast spindle power were positively associated with individual overnight memory improvement. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. Sixteen healthy adults aged 60 or older took part in a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled crossover study with two stimulation nights and two sham nights in a sleep laboratory. [1]

  2. Compared with sham, stimulation increased slow oscillation, frontal theta, slow spindle and fast spindle power without altering sleep architecture, while word-pair recall did not improve at group level. [1]

  3. Individual differences in stimulation-induced fast spindle power increases were positively associated with individual differences in overnight memory improvement. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled crossover study (abstract).
Population / context
Sixteen healthy older adults aged 60 or older (mean age 65.06 ± 3.53 years).
Summary based on
Study abstract
Publication status
Preprint · peer-review status not confirmed
Original publication
August 20, 2026

Stimulation versus sham nights in 16 older adults

The abstract describes a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled crossover study. Sixteen healthy older adults aged 60 or older (mean age 65.06 ± 3.53 years) spent two stimulation nights and two sham nights in a sleep laboratory. Slow oscillations (0.5–1.25 Hz), frontal theta (4–8 Hz), centrofrontal slow spindles (12–14 Hz) and centroparietal fast spindles (14–16 Hz) were compared between stimulation and sham conditions.

Supporting source [1]

More oscillation power, unchanged sleep architecture

Compared with sham, stimulation increased power of slow oscillations, frontal theta, centrofrontal slow spindles and centroparietal fast spindles across both stimulation nights. Sleep architecture was not altered. Declarative memory was measured with a word-pair recall task requiring overnight retention, and broader cognition with the Creyos battery. Word-pair recall did not improve at the group level.

Supporting source [1]

Fast spindles linked to individual memory change

Individual differences in stimulation-induced increases in fast spindle power were positively associated with individual differences in overnight memory improvement. The authors suggest fast spindles as a physiological marker of successful sleep-dependent memory consolidation and a potential target for sleep-based neuromodulation in aging. This is an association, not evidence that stimulation causes memory improvement.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The sample was small (16 healthy older adults), and the memory finding is an association between individual differences, not a group-level memory benefit or proof of causation.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Closed-Loop Auditory Stimulation Reveals Differential Sleep Oscillatory Contributions to Memory in Healthy Older Adults

Sabaghypour S, Oprea L, Powanwe AS, Moreau CN, Alfeche N, Owen AM, Kohler S, Muller LE, Batterink LJ. · europepmc.org · August 20, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    Sixteen healthy older adults (≥60 years
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    PLAS enhanced sleep oscillatory activity without altering
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    positively associated with individual differences in overnight

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…