Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
NAD⁺ & NMN
Video summary

Creator reports no measurable change from NMN and NR in a 1-year self-test

In the description, Zac Armstrong says a 1-year experiment with $79 NMN and NR supplements showed zero measurable improvements in tracked markers such as HRV, resting heart rate, deep sleep, inflammation and metabolic blood panels. This is a creator account, not a controlled study. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. The creator describes a 1-year experiment testing $79 anti-aging supplements named NMN and NR, tracking HRV, resting heart rate, deep sleep, inflammation and metabolic blood panels. [1]

  2. According to the description, NMN and NR produced zero measurable improvements in the tracked markers. [1]

  3. The description presents Executive Health Edge as a physician-supervised program for men aged 40 to 65 with blood analysis at 0, 6 and 12 months. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Video description of a creator's self-reported 1-year supplement experiment
Population / context
Zac Armstrong, described as a retired Naval Commander, and the men aged 40 to 65 targeted by his program; the experiment's participants are not specified.
Summary based on
Creator description
Original publication
September 19, 2026

Creator's 1-year NMN and NR self-test

The description presents a clip from 'No Hype, Just Standards' in which Zac Armstrong describes a 1-year experiment testing popular $79 anti-aging supplements, named as NMN and NR. He says he tracked downstream markers including HRV, resting heart rate, deep sleep, inflammation and metabolic blood panels. The description does not state doses, product brands, a comparison group or how the markers were analyzed.

Supporting source [1]

Reported zero improvements in tracked markers

According to the description, NMN and NR produced zero measurable improvements across the tracked markers. The creator frames reliance on marketing stories without objective lab verification as a trap for men over 40. These are the creator's reported results and interpretation; the description gives no numbers, no statistical analysis and no independent replication.

Supporting source [1]

Program context and description-only scope

The description also presents Executive Health Edge, a physician-supervised program for men aged 40 to 65, with blood analysis at 0, 6 and 12 months and wearable tracking. It is unclear whether the 1-year experiment was part of this program. Only the description was available: the video and transcript were not reviewed, so details of the experiment cannot be checked.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Only the video description was available; the video and transcript were not reviewed. The description reports a creator's self-test without doses, comparison group, numbers or statistical analysis, so the results cannot be verified.

Based on the creator’s description; the full video and transcript were not analyzed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Why NMN & NR Failed My 1-Year Longevity Test

Zac Armstrong · youtube.com · September 19, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    a 1-year experiment testing popular $79 anti-aging
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    NMN and NR produced zero measurable improvements
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    physician-supervised health optimization program for high-performing men

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…