Doctor examines whether NAD+ blood tests reflect biological age
Thumbnail from YouTube. Playing loads the YouTube player.
History & recommendationsOff
Keep recently viewed content on this browser. Your history stays on this device and is never sent to Harbor. Videos you play can also help order related video recommendations.
Open saved items & history →At a glance
Automatic summary · not editorially reviewedIn the description, Dr. Joanette says whole-blood NAD+ levels stayed essentially flat from age 18 to 70 in a validated test of 300+ people, confirmed by an independent Helsinki study, so such tests may not clearly indicate cellular health. [1]
The description says a finger-prick test kit sold now claims to reveal biological age through NAD+. [1]
The description says a validated blood test with 300+ people found NAD+ levels essentially flat from age 18 to 70, confirmed independently in Helsinki. [1]
The description includes a segment on what the findings do and do not mean for NAD+ supplementation. [1]
Claimed finger-prick NAD+ biological age test
The description says a finger-prick test kit sold now claims to reveal biological age through a molecule called NAD+. Dr. Joanette, an emergency medicine doctor, says she reviews the data on NAD+ levels as a biomarker for aging to see whether they reflect a person's internal state. She frames the video as reading the evidence like a chart rather than a headline. The description does not report the kit's name, price or how its result is calculated. [1]
Flat whole-blood NAD+ from 18 to 70
According to the description, a newly validated blood test with more than 300 people found no age-related decline in NAD+ levels, which remained essentially flat from age 18 to 70. A second, independent confirmation is said to come from Helsinki. The description also mentions a tissue-level answer to whether NAD+ declines with age and says blood does not reliably reflect what happens in tissues. It adds that mail-in shipping adds noise and distinguishes whole-blood from white-blood-cell tests. [1]
What the NAD+ findings mean for supplements
The description lists a segment on what the findings do and do not mean for NAD+ supplementation, and a closing lesson on telling real signal from convenient marketing. It does not state any supplementation outcome, dose or recommendation. Dr. Joanette presents herself as founder of Optimum Health MD and offers help placing such information into a personal health picture. The description is a video summary by the creator, not a report of a new study conducted by her. [1]
Context & limits
This is based only on the video description; the video and transcript were not reviewed. Study details, numbers and conclusions are as the creator states them, and no full text of the cited studies was checked.
Based on the creator’s description; the full video and transcript were not analyzed.
Quoted passages in the original language
There's a finger-prick test you can buy
300+ people, no age-related decline
What this does and doesn't mean for
About this video
Creator description · original textText language: American English
Dr. Joanette MD · 13 min · Source published: 2026-09-23
Added to Harbor: 10/23/2026
Original on YouTube ↗Automatically categorized source. Creator statements are not an independent evidence review or personal medical guidance.