Deine Themen. Neue Beiträge.

Eine kompakte Browser-Benachrichtigung, wenn es Neues gibt. Höchstens einmal am Tag – auch ohne Konto.

Was interessiert dich?

Freiwillig und jederzeit hier abschaltbar. Themenauswahl und Geräte-Abonnement werden gespeichert; eine E-Mail-Adresse ist nicht nötig. Datenschutz

Den Harbor durchsuchenEN/DEKonto
Videothek· Aging Journal

Longevity & Aging Series (S3, E6): Girish Harinath | Aging-US

Vorschaubild von YouTube. Abspielen lädt den YouTube-Player.

Verlauf & EmpfehlungenAus

Zuletzt angesehene Inhalte in diesem Browser behalten. Dein Verlauf bleibt auf diesem Gerät und wird nicht an Harbor gesendet. Abgespielte Videos können auch passende Videoempfehlungen sortieren.

Bis zu 120 Einträge · 90 Tage. Ausschalten löscht den Verlauf.
Merkliste & Verlauf öffnen →

Über dieses Video

Beschreibung des Creators · Originalsprache

In this episode of the Longevity & Aging Series, Girish Harinath from AgelessRx joins host Dr. Evgeniy Galimov to discuss a #research paper he co-authored in Volume 17, Issue 4 of Aging-US, titled “Influence of rapamycin on safety and healthspan metrics after one year: PEARL trial results.” @agelessrx #author #interview #authorinterview #aging #rapamycin #geroscience #longevity #healthspan #openaccess #openscience #peerreviewed #journal #publishing #meded DOI - https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.206235 Corresponding author - Stefanie L. Morgan - stefanie@agelessrx.com Stefanie L. Morgan interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qlIiVh2OJs Abstract video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5j2nyK2HZ8 Abstract Design: This 48-week decentralized, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04488601) evaluated the long-term safety of intermittent low-dose rapamycin in a healthy, normative-aging human cohort. Participants received placebo, 5 mg or 10 mg compounded rapamycin weekly. The primary outcome measure was visceral adiposity (by DXA scan), secondary outcomes were blood biomarkers, and lean tissue and bone mineral content (by DXA scan). Established surveys were utilized to evaluate health and well-being. Safety was assessed through adverse events and blood biomarker monitoring. Results: Adverse and serious adverse events were similar across all groups. Visceral adiposity did not change significantly (ηp2 = 0.001, p = 0.942), and changes in blood biomarkers remained within normal ranges. Lean tissue mass (ηp2 = 0.202, p = 0.013) and self-reported pain (ηp2 = 0.168, p = 0.015) improved significantly for women using 10 mg rapamycin. Self-reported emotional well-being (ηp2 = 0.108, p = 0.023) and general health (ηp2 = 0.166, p = 0.004) also improved for those using 5 mg rapamycin. No other significant effects were observed. Conclusions: Low-dose, intermittent rapamycin administration over 48 weeks is relatively safe in healthy, normative-aging adults, and was associated with significant improvements in lean tissue mass and pain in women. Future work will evaluate benefits of a broader range of rapamycin doses on healthspan metrics for longevity, and will aim to more comprehensively establish efficacy. Sign up for free Altmetric alerts about this article - https://aging.altmetric.com/details/email_updates?id=10.18632%2Faging.206235 Subscribe for free publication alerts from Aging - https://www.aging-us.com/subscribe-to-toc-alerts Keywords - aging, rapamycin, geroscience, longevity, healthspan To learn more about the journal, please visit our website at https://www.Aging-US.com​​ and connect with us on social media at: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/AgingUS/ X - https://twitter.com/AgingJrnl Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/agingjrnl/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@Aging-US LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/aging/ Bluesky - https://bsky.app/profile/aging-us.bsky.social Pinterest - https://www.pinterest.com/AgingUS/ Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/1X4HQQgegjReaf6Mozn6Mc MEDIA@IMPACTJOURNALS.COM

Aging Journal · 61 min · Quelle veröffentlicht: 2025-09-26

Zu Harbor hinzugefügt: 22.10.2026

Original auf YouTube ↗

Automatisch eingeordnete Quelle. Creator-Aussagen sind keine unabhängige Evidenzprüfung und keine persönliche medizinische Beratung.

Diskussion

Community-Diskussionen

0 Themen

Mitgliederbeiträge. Quellen nennen, kommerzielle Interessen offenlegen und keine persönliche medizinische Beratung oder Dosierungsempfehlungen geben.

Wird geladen…