Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Nutrition foundations
Research brief

Virtual nutrition pilot for older Veterans: two-year design, satisfaction and diet quality

An abstract reports a two-year pilot adding age-friendly virtual nutrition education and produce to an existing health promotion program for older Veterans, with satisfaction, diet quality and health-related quality of life as outcomes. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. The project piloted age-friendly, tailored, virtual nutrition education within an existing health promotion program for older Veterans, using an iterative design process over two years. [1]

  2. Year 1 had 14 weeks of virtual nutrition education with weekly produce bags; Year 2 shifted to hands-on cooking and a farmer's market model for self-selection. [1]

  3. Primary outcomes were program satisfaction, dietary intake via 24-hour recall for HEI-2015, and health-related quality of life via PROMIS Global Health; the abstract reports feasibility and acceptability. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Abstract of a two-year pilot program
Population / context
Older Veterans in an existing health promotion program
Summary based on
Study abstract
Publication status
Preprint · peer-review status not confirmed
Original publication
September 29, 2026

Older Veterans and tailored virtual nutrition pilot

The abstract notes that many older Veterans do not meet national dietary recommendations, and existing programs are not typically tailored for older Veterans who may face physical and environmental limits on accessing and preparing healthy foods. The project therefore piloted age-friendly, tailored, virtual nutrition education inside an existing health promotion program for older Veterans. Programming followed an iterative design process over two years.

Supporting source [1]

Year 1 education with produce bags; Year 2 cooking and market

Year 1 included 14 weeks of virtual nutrition education on healthy aging paired with weekly produce bags and recipe suggestions. In Year 2, the virtual education shifted to more hands-on learning emphasizing basic meal preparation and adaptive cooking strategies for mobility limitations. Produce distribution in Year 2 shifted to a farmer's market model, based on feedback from Year 1, allowing participants to self-select items.

Supporting source [1]

Satisfaction, diet quality and quality of life outcomes

Primary outcomes included program satisfaction, dietary intake assessed via 24-hour recall to calculate the Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015), and health-related quality of life (PROMIS Global Health). The abstract states that findings demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual nutrition program incorporating age-friendly cooking instruction and adaptive strategies to improve dietary quality among older Veterans. The abstract does not report participant numbers, follow-up length, effect sizes or statistical uncertainty.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

This is an abstract; the full text was not reviewed. Participant numbers, follow-up length, effect sizes and statistical uncertainty are not reported in the abstract.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
An Evolution of Pilot Nutrition Programs to Improve Diet Quality among Older Veterans

Giffuni J, Fique M, Cassatt S, Joyce K, Krasniewski L, Addison O, Dennis EA. · europepmc.org · September 29, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    iterative design process over two years
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    14 weeks of virtual nutrition education
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    feasibility and acceptability of a virtual nutrition

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…