Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

EEG-predicted brain age in young adults with cognitive deficits and mental health conditions

In this abstract, EEG-based functional connectivity was used to estimate brain age; higher estimated brain age was linked to lower memory and attention scores, and most young adults with mental symptoms had higher brain age than their chronological age. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. Brain age was estimated from EEG-based functional connectivity; prediction error was 5.97 mean absolute error in training data and 10.73 in prediction data. [1]

  2. Increased brain age was negatively related to memory and attention task scores, and 19 of 26 young adults with mental symptoms had higher brain age than chronological age. [1]

  3. Frontal and central motor connectivity distinguished high and low brain age and correlated with brain age but not chronological age. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Abstract of a study estimating brain age from EEG-based functional connectivity
Population / context
Healthy adults, including young adults with mental symptoms such as addictions, depression, phobia and anorexia nervosa.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Publication status
Preprint · peer-review status not confirmed
Original publication
September 24, 2026

EEG brain-age estimates in healthy adults

The abstract describes a study relating brain age, estimated from EEG-based functional connectivity, to cognitive and mental manifestations in healthy adults. Prediction errors were reported separately for training data (mean absolute error 5.97, R-squared 0.85) and prediction data (mean absolute error 10.73, R-squared 0.56). The abstract does not report sample size for the overall cohort, follow-up or how the EEG recordings were collected.

Supporting source [1]

Higher brain age and cognitive and mental symptoms

Increased brain age was negatively related to scores on memory and attention tasks. Most young adults with mental symptoms — 19 of 26 — had higher brain age than their chronological age; the symptoms named were addictions, depression, phobia and anorexia nervosa. Alcohol consumption was also significantly correlated with the difference between brain and chronological age. These are associations in the abstract, not evidence that brain age causes these conditions.

Supporting source [1]

Frontal and central motor connectivity as key features

Functional connectivity of frontal and central motor regions differed most between individuals with high and low brain age. These regions were significantly correlated with brain age but not with chronological age, which the authors interpret as a relatively stronger relationship with biological age. Additional analyses removing parts of the data confirmed the importance of the frontal brain and of all EEG frequency bands for prediction. The abstract does not report whether the findings were tested in an independent sample.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

This explainer is based only on the abstract; the full text was not reviewed. The abstract does not report the overall sample size, follow-up, EEG recording details or independent validation. The findings are associations, not evidence of causation, and the abstract does not establish that brain age predicts future health outcomes.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    A mean absolute error (MAE) of 5.97
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    Most young adults (19 of 26)
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    frontal and central motor regions

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…