Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

Employment trajectories from ages 18–50 and epigenetic age acceleration by race and ethnicity

In a US survey sample, Black and Hispanic adults more often entered the workforce late; employment trajectory was largely unrelated to epigenetic age acceleration, yet racial differences in several clocks persisted within similar work histories. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. Black and Hispanic adults had more than twice the odds of a late workforce entry trajectory than White adults, with differences concentrated in delayed entry. [1]

  2. Across five epigenetic clocks (N = 1861), employment trajectory was largely unrelated to epigenetic age acceleration and did not moderate racial and ethnic differences in it. [1]

  3. Black adults showed faster DunedinPACE and GrimAge acceleration than White adults within trajectories, but differed in the opposite direction on the Hannum clock. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Observational study using survey data with sequence and cluster analysis and regression models
Population / context
Adults in the 2016 Health and Retirement Study with linked life-history and blood data; epigenetic models included N = 1861.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
September 23, 2026

Work histories ages 18–50 in a US survey sample

The study used the 2016 Health and Retirement Study with the linked Life History Mail Survey and Venous Blood Study. Employment histories were built from ages 18 to 50, and sequence and cluster analysis identified four trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression showed Black and Hispanic adults had more than twice the odds of a "Late Workforce Entry" trajectory than White adults, with differences concentrated in delayed entry rather than mid-career disruption or non-employment.

Supporting source [1]

Clocks largely unrelated to trajectory in weighted models

In survey-weighted ordinary least squares models across five epigenetic clocks (N = 1861), employment trajectory was largely unrelated to epigenetic age acceleration and did not moderate racial and ethnic differences in it. The authors describe this as partial alignment with the weathering hypothesis, which they used as a guiding framework.

Supporting source [1]

Racial differences within similar work histories

Racial differences persisted within trajectories: Black adults showed faster DunedinPACE and GrimAge acceleration than White adults, with DunedinPACE differences within stable full-time work and both differences within long-term non-employment, while differing in the opposite direction on the age-predictive Hannum clock. The authors suggest the biological consequences of employment may depend not only on long-term work patterns but also on unequal conditions and experiences within them.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. This is an observational analysis of survey data, so associations are not causal, and the abstract does not report follow-up duration or clock-specific effect sizes.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Employment trajectories and biological aging: Racial and ethnic disparities in work instability and epigenetic age acceleration.

Lai WH, Lin TS, Cho TC, Meier HCS, Ammous F, Leggett AN. · europepmc.org · September 23, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    more than twice the odds of "Late
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    employment trajectory was largely unrelated to EAA
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    differing in the opposite direction on the

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…