Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

Cross-sectional study links accelerated PhenoAge to larger drusen burden in age-related macular degeneration

In a cross-sectional survey cohort, people whose PhenoAge was more than 3 years above their chronological age had higher odds of drusen ≥500 μm and ≥125 μm, but not of pigmentary abnormalities. This is an association, not proof of cause. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. This cross-sectional study used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 5322 participants with a mean age of 59.4 years. [1]

  2. PhenoAge Acceleration above +3 years was associated with higher odds of drusen ≥500 μm (odds ratio 1.56). [1]

  3. The association appeared for drusen ≥125 μm but not for pigmentary abnormalities. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Cross-sectional study (abstract)
Population / context
5322 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, mean age 59.4 ± 12.4 years, 50.4% female.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
September 14, 2026

PhenoAge and retinal features in a US survey cohort

The study asked whether accelerated biological ageing, estimated with the PhenoAge algorithm from routine blood biomarkers plus chronological age, is associated with features of early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration. It used cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and included 5322 participants (mean age 59.4 ± 12.4 years; 50.4% female). PhenoAge Acceleration was defined as the residual from regressing PhenoAge on chronological age.

Supporting source [1]

Higher odds for large drusen, not pigmentary abnormalities

Drusen ≥500 μm, the primary outcome, were present in 4.1%; drusen ≥125 μm in 10.2%; pigmentary abnormalities in 5.6%. PhenoAge Acceleration above +3 years was associated with higher odds of drusen ≥500 μm (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.07–2.27, p = 0.022). It was also associated with drusen ≥125 μm (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.65, p = 0.049), but not with pigmentary abnormalities. Models were adjusted for biological sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, body mass index and diabetes.

Supporting source [1]

Cross-sectional design limits causal reading of the association

The authors conclude that accelerated biological ageing was associated with increased drusen burden but not pigmentary abnormalities, suggesting early structural features of age-related macular degeneration may reflect broader systemic ageing processes. Because the design is cross-sectional, timing and direction cannot be established from these data. The abstract reports no follow-up period. The findings describe associations only and do not show that accelerated ageing causes drusen.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The design is cross-sectional, so temporal order and causality cannot be assessed, and no follow-up period is reported. Findings are associations in this survey cohort and do not establish that accelerated biological ageing causes drusen.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Accelerated biological ageing is associated with a large drusen burden.

Ørskov M, Cehofski LJ, Faber C, Forte P, Hansen MS, Muttuvelu DV, Niazi S, Schou MG, Shekho N, Reiter GS, Utheim TP, Vergmann AS, Subhi Y. · europepmc.org · September 14, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    A total of 5322 participants were included
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    higher odds of drusen ≥500 μm
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    but not with pigmentary abnormalities

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…