Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Exercise & healthspan
Research brief

Structured lifestyle program and PhenoAge in Arab adults with prediabetes

In this 6-month randomized trial in Arab adults with prediabetes, a structured lifestyle program reduced PhenoAge by 4.9 years on average, while the control group rose by 1.3 years; GDF-15 and sclerostin changes appeared time-dependent rather than program-specific. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. The trial enrolled 181 Arab adults with prediabetes and followed them for 6 months, comparing a structured lifestyle program with a control group that received a brochure. [1]

  2. PhenoAge fell by 4.9 years in the lifestyle program versus a 1.3-year rise in the control group, with a reported between-group p value. [1]

  3. Changes in GDF-15 and sclerostin appeared time-dependent rather than specific to the intervention. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Randomized clinical trial (abstract)
Population / context
Arab adults with prediabetes (181 participants; 130 males, 51 females; mean age 50.8 years; mean BMI 30.0).
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
September 10, 2026

PhenoAge as primary endpoint in prediabetes trial

The abstract describes a randomized clinical trial with 181 Arab adults with prediabetes (130 males, 51 females; mean age 50.8 years; mean BMI 30.0). Participants were assigned to a structured lifestyle modification program or a control group and followed for 6 months. The program asked for a 5% weight reduction, moderate exercise of 150 minutes per week, fat intake reduced to 30% and fiber intake increased by 15 g per 1 kcal; the control group received a brochure. PhenoAge was the primary endpoint, with sclerostin and GDF-15 as secondary endpoints.

Supporting source [1]

PhenoAge fell 4.9 years versus 1.3-year rise

Compared with the control group, participants in the lifestyle program showed a significant reduction in PhenoAge: -4.9 versus +1.3 years, with a between-group p value reported in the abstract. The conclusion states that the intervention significantly improved PhenoAge, accompanied by improvements in metabolic parameters. Changes in GDF-15 and sclerostin appeared time-dependent rather than specific to the intervention. The authors describe these findings as supporting lifestyle modification as a potential strategy to slow a composite clinical measure of biological aging.

Supporting source [1]

Abstract-only scope of the 6-month trial

This explainer is based only on the abstract; the full text was not reviewed. The abstract reports a 6-month follow-up and a randomized design but does not give the full statistical details, adverse events or long-term outcomes. PhenoAge is described as a composite clinical measure of biological aging, not as a direct measure of lifespan. The reported associations come from a single trial in Arab adults with prediabetes and should not be read as proof that the program extends life or as personal advice.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The abstract does not report full statistical details, adverse events or long-term outcomes, and the 6-month trial covers Arab adults with prediabetes only. PhenoAge is a composite clinical measure, not a direct lifespan measure.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Structured lifestyle modification and biological aging: effects on PhenoAge, sclerostin, and GDF-15 in arab adults with prediabetes.

Alenezi A, Sabico S, Alnaami AM, Hussain SD, Elrobh MS, Al-Daghri NM. · europepmc.org · September 10, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    followed for 6 months
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    -4.9 vs. +1.3 years
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    time-dependent rather than intervention-specific

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…