Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Sleep & recovery
Research brief

Self-reported napping at round 3 and later possible/probable dementia in 995 NHATS participants

In 995 U.S. older adults without possible/probable dementia at round 3 (2013), frequent and unintentional self-reported napping were associated with higher hazard of later possible/probable dementia through round 13 (2023); this is an association, not proof of cause. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. 995 participants without possible/probable dementia at round 3 (2013) were followed to round 13 (2023). [1]

  2. Frequent nappers had 1.48 times the hazard of incident possible/probable dementia versus non-nappers (95% CI 1.14–1.94). [1]

  3. The authors say napping may be a modifiable risk factor only if further evidence supports it. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Observational cohort study (abstract)
Population / context
995 U.S. older adults free of possible/probable dementia at round 3 (2013) in the National Health and Aging Trends Study.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
September 1, 2026

Napping self-reported in 2013, dementia tracked to 2023

The study asked whether daytime napping is linked to dementia in U.S. older adults. Data came from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. At round 3 (2013), participants reported napping frequency (non-napper, infrequent, frequent), intention (non-napper, intentional, unintentional) and duration (non-napper, ≤30 minutes, >30 minutes). The 995 included participants had no possible/probable dementia at round 3 and were followed to round 13 (2023). Dementia was classified at each round with a validated algorithm, and possible/probable dementia was the outcome.

Supporting source [1]

Frequent and unintentional napping linked to higher hazard

Compared with non-nappers, frequent nappers had 1.48 times the hazard of incident possible/probable dementia (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.94). Unintentional napping was also associated (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.81). No associations were found for infrequent or intentional napping. Napping ≤30 minutes was associated (hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.85), while the association for napping >30 minutes weakened after further adjustment for sleep variables (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.69). Models adjusted for demographic, health and sleep variables.

Supporting source [1]

Observational design limits causal reading of napping links

The authors describe daytime napping as possibly a modifiable risk factor for dementia only if further evidence supports this. They call for future studies with detailed napping characteristics and longer follow-up. Because napping was self-reported and this is an observational cohort, the results show associations, not that napping causes dementia. This summary is based on the abstract; the full text was not reviewed.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. Napping was self-reported, the design is an observational cohort, and the findings are associations, not evidence that napping causes dementia.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Napping characteristics and incident dementia: results from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

Jiang K, Gross AL, Wu CT, Li J, Amjad H, Wickwire EM, Albrecht JS, Malhotra A, Tseng CI, Kaizi-Lutu M, Liu C, Kaufmann CN, Spira AP. · europepmc.org · September 1, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    followed up to round 13 (2023)
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    frequent nappers had 1.48 times the hazard
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    may be a modifiable risk factor for

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…