Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

Metabolomic ageing clock differences across nine mental disorder groups in UK Biobank

In UK Biobank, a plasma metabolomic ageing clock estimated an older metabolite-predicted age for substance use, psychotic, affective and neurotic disorders, but some disorders were linked to a younger biological age; associations differed by sex, age group and genetic liability. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. Among 225,212 UK Biobank participants, 38,524 had a mental disorder diagnosis preceding baseline. [1]

  2. Substance use, psychotic, affective and neurotic disorders were associated with a metabolite-predicted age older than chronological age, largest for psychosis. [1]

  3. Some disorders were linked to a younger biological age, and genetic liability diverged from clinical phenotypes. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Observational study using plasma metabolomic profiles and health-record/self-reported diagnoses (abstract)
Population / context
225,212 UK Biobank participants (54% female; mean age 56.97), of whom 38,524 had a mental disorder diagnosis preceding baseline.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
June 22, 2026

Metabolomic clock in 225,212 UK Biobank participants

The abstract describes a study using plasma metabolomic profiles from UK Biobank participants. A metabolomic ageing clock (MileAge) estimated disorder-specific differences between metabolite-predicted and chronological age. Mental disorders came from health records and self-reported physician diagnoses. The analysis covered nine diagnostic groups and 45 individual disorders and examined sex and age group differences and associations with polygenic scores. Among 225,212 participants (54% female; mean age 56.97), 38,524 had a diagnosis preceding baseline.

Supporting source [1]

Older predicted age largest for psychosis

Substance use, psychotic, affective and neurotic disorders were associated with a metabolite-predicted age older than chronological age. The largest difference was for psychosis (β=0.556, 95% CI 0.250 to 0.861, p). The abstract states that metabolomic ageing in mental disorders is heterogeneous: while many disorders were associated with an older biological age, some were linked to a younger biological age. These are associations, not evidence that a disorder causes ageing.

Supporting source [1]

Genetic liability diverges from clinical diagnoses

The authors report that divergence between genetic liability and clinical phenotypes suggests non-genetic factors shape biological ageing differences. They conclude that biological age should not be assumed to uniformly exceed chronological age across mental disorders, and that sex- and age-specific approaches could improve understanding. The abstract does not report effect estimates for the younger-age disorders, the sex or age group results, or the polygenic score findings.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The abstract gives no effect estimates for the younger-age disorders, sex or age group results, or polygenic score findings, and the reported associations do not establish causation.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Metabolomic ageing across mental and behavioural disorders.

Mutz J, Gilchrist L, Allegrini AG, Sanchez Roige S, Lewis CM. · europepmc.org · June 22, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    38 524 had a diagnosis preceding baseline
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    largest for psychosis
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    some are linked to a younger biological

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…