Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

Environmentally adjusted lipidomic metabolic age score tested in four cohorts

Researchers built an environmentally adjusted metabolic age score from plasma lipid profiles and report it was more consistently linked to dementia, cardiovascular events and death than an unadjusted lipidomic age model. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. EAmAge was derived in the AusDiab cohort (n = 10,339) after major environmental influences were statistically removed from plasma lipidomic profiles. [1]

  2. EAmAge was validated in three independent cohorts (BHS, ADNI and ASPREE; total n = 9,835). [1]

  3. Compared with an unadjusted lipidomic age model, EAmAge showed stronger and more consistent associations with incident Alzheimer's disease-related dementia, cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Abstract of a cohort-based biomarker development and validation study
Population / context
Participants in the AusDiab, BHS, ADNI and ASPREE cohorts (total n = 20,174 across derivation and validation).
Summary based on
Study abstract
Publication status
Preprint · peer-review status not confirmed
Original publication
June 9, 2026

Adjusted lipidomic age score built in AusDiab

The authors describe biological age scores as capturing ageing differences beyond chronological age, but note these are often dominated by lifestyle and environmental exposures. To isolate what they call intrinsic ageing biology, they statistically removed major environmental influences from plasma lipidomic profiles and then built an age-prediction model using ridge regression. The resulting score, EAmAge, was derived in the AusDiab cohort with 10,339 participants.

Supporting source [1]

Validation in three cohorts and outcome links

EAmAge was validated in three independent cohorts, BHS, ADNI and ASPREE, with a total of 9,835 participants. Compared with an unadjusted lipidomic age model (mAge_orig), EAmAge showed stronger and more consistent associations with incident Alzheimer's disease-related dementia, cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. It was also associated with Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers, including amyloid burden, reduced glucose metabolism and hippocampal atrophy. These are associations, not evidence that the score causes these outcomes.

Supporting source [1]

Abstract-only scope and biomarker framing

The authors describe EAmAge as a robust and partially modifiable biomarker that may improve risk stratification by separating intrinsic metabolic ageing from environmental confounding. The available text is an abstract; the full text was not reviewed. Details such as follow-up length, how environmental factors were defined, and the exact outcome definitions are not reported here, so the strength and clinical usefulness of the score remain to be judged from the full study.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. Follow-up duration, definitions of environmental factors and outcome ascertainment are not reported in the supplied text. Reported links are associations, not causal effects.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
A lipidomic based metabolic age score for monitoring the effects of lifestyle and diet on metabolic disease risk

Meikle P, Wang T, Beyene H, Yi C, Duong T, Mellett N, Meikle T, Wu J, Dakic A, Cinel M, Watts G, Hung J, Hui J, Beilby J, Blangero J, Salim A, Moses E, Arnold M, Kastenmüller G, Han X, Blach C, Yu C, McNeil J, Lacaze P, Nho K, Saykin A, Shaw J, Magliano D(, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Giles C, Huynh K. · europepmc.org · June 9, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    derived in the AusDiab cohort (n =
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    validated across three independent cohorts
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    stronger and more consistent associations

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…