Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Hallmarks of aging
Research brief

Frailty index and chronic pain in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

In a cross-sectional survey of adults aged 45 and older in China, a higher corrected modified frailty index was associated with more chronic pain, including low back and multisite pain; depression may explain part of this link. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. The cross-sectional study included 5821 participants aged 45 or older from the 2011 baseline wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. [1]

  2. Compared with the lowest frailty quartile, the highest quartile had higher odds of low back pain and multisite pain and a higher rate of pain sites. [1]

  3. Depression mediated about 30% of the associations, and the authors note that the cross-sectional design cannot establish direction. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Population-based cross-sectional study with mediation analysis (abstract)
Population / context
Adults aged 45 or older in the 2011 baseline wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
October 1, 2026

Frailty index and self-reported pain in CHARLS participants

The study asked whether overall frailty, measured with the corrected modified frailty index (CMFI), is linked to chronic pain in middle-aged and older adults. The CMFI reflects accumulated health impairments across several dimensions. The data came from 5821 participants aged 45 or older in the 2011 baseline wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Chronic pain was assessed by self-report questionnaire and covered low back pain, pain at multiple sites, and the number of pain sites. This was a cross-sectional study, so frailty and pain were measured at the same time rather than one before the other.

Supporting source [1]

Highest frailty quartile linked to more pain sites

Analyses used data from 5281 participants. Compared with the lowest CMFI quartile, the highest quartile showed higher odds of low back pain (odds ratio 11.6, 95% confidence interval 8.96–15.0), of multisite pain (odds ratio 17.0, 95% confidence interval 13.1–22.2), and a higher rate of pain sites (incidence rate ratio 11.5, 95% confidence interval 8.90–14.8). Associations differed across subgroups defined by age, education and residence. Depression mediated about 30% of these associations; the abstract also mentions a possible role of C-reactive protein. These are associations, not evidence that frailty causes pain.

Supporting source [1]

Cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions

The authors conclude that higher CMFI levels were associated with greater risk and burden of chronic pain, with depression potentially accounting for part of the association. They suggest including mental health assessments in frailty and pain management for the middle-aged and older adults studied. Because the design is cross-sectional, the direction of any relationship cannot be established from this abstract. The abstract does not report follow-up, and the full text was not reviewed.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The cross-sectional design cannot establish whether frailty precedes pain or vice versa, and the abstract reports no follow-up.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    5821 participants aged ≥45 years
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    the highest CMFI quartile showed significantly higher
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    Depression mediated approximately 30% of these associations

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…