Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Video library· This Is Not Covered - Dr. Ashley Froese

Doctor Reviews NAD+ vs Peptides - Which Does MORE?

Thumbnail from YouTube. Playing loads the YouTube player.

History & recommendationsOff

Keep recently viewed content on this browser. Your history stays on this device and is never sent to Harbor. Videos you play can also help order related video recommendations.

Up to 120 items · 90 days. Turning this off deletes the history.
Open saved items & history →

About this video

Creator description · original language

In this video, I break down two of the buzziest topics in wellness right now—NAD+ therapy and peptides—and give you a clear, no-nonsense comparison from a real primary care doctor. What you’ll learn in this video: What NAD+ is, how it fuels your mitochondria, and why you might need more of it as you age What peptides are, the most common ones being used (BPC-157, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, etc.), and what they claim to do The truth about cost, safety, and clinical evidence My honest take as a doctor on whether NAD or peptides are worth your money I’ll cover benefits, risks, sourcing issues, and real-world stories so you can decide which—if any—makes sense for your goals. ***Nothing I share here is personal medical advice. Always check with your own provider before starting a new supplement or treatment.*** my preferred brand (this is an affiliate link and I earn a small comission from purchases made through this link): https://bit.ly/45DOjXF Get a FREE Peptide Roadmap https://peptideroadmap.drafroese.com

This Is Not Covered - Dr. Ashley Froese · 7 min · Source published: 2025-09-09

Added to Harbor: 10/22/2026

Original on YouTube ↗

Automatically categorized source. Creator statements are not an independent evidence review or personal medical guidance.

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…