Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Video library· Dr. Greg JonesAudio language not provided

Calorie Deficit: Muscle Protection vs. Training Volume #shorts

Thumbnail from YouTube. Playing loads the YouTube player.

History & recommendationsOff

Keep recently viewed content on this browser. Your history stays on this device and is never sent to Harbor. Videos you play can also help order related video recommendations.

Up to 120 items · 90 days. Turning this off deletes the history.
Open saved items & history →

About this video

Creator description · original textText language: English

Cutting calories doesn’t mean you need to train harder. 👇 A new study put this idea to the test. Researchers compared 12 vs. 30 sets per muscle group per week while resistance-trained adults were in a 40% calorie deficit. The result? 🔥 Both groups lost similar amounts of weight and fat. 💪 Both groups preserved their fat-free mass equally. 📈 Tripling training volume did not provide extra muscle protection. Train with purpose. Recover like it matters. Because it does. 🔥 Study: PMID 42103927 #StrengthTraining #Recovery #DrGregJones #short

Dr. Greg Jones · 2 min · Source published: 2026-10-14

Added to Harbor: 10/23/2026

Original on YouTube ↗

Automatically categorized source. Creator statements are not an independent evidence review or personal medical guidance.

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…