Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Exercise & healthspan
Research brief

PhysAgeNet position paper: recommendations for technology-assisted physical activity in older adults

A PhysAgeNet position paper recommends designing, evaluating and implementing technology-assisted physical activity interventions for older adults around clinical evidence and user needs rather than technological possibilities. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. The paper says technology development and implementation are often driven by technological possibilities rather than clinical evidence and user needs. [1]

  2. The position paper comes from the PhysAgeNet COST Action and combines current evidence with expert consensus. [1]

  3. The authors propose stakeholder-specific guidance for developers, researchers and clinicians, including user assessment and recruitment of vulnerable groups. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Position paper (abstract)
Population / context
Older adults addressed by technology-assisted physical activity interventions
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
September 28, 2026

PhysAgeNet paper targets technology-push in older adults

Digital health technologies could support physical activity among older adults, but the paper states their development and implementation often follow technological possibilities rather than clinical evidence and user needs. The authors describe the paper as a position paper from the PhysAgeNet COST Action that combines current evidence and expert consensus into recommendations for designing, evaluating and implementing such interventions.

Supporting source [1]

Wearables, exergames and apps must fit clinical guidelines

The paper outlines technology categories and functions for promoting physical activity: wearables, exergames, mobile applications, telehealth platforms and smart environments. It names technical requirements such as accuracy, reliability, connectivity, interoperability and data security. It also stresses aligning digital interventions with established clinical guidelines for physical activity, falls prevention, frailty and sarcopenia, including explicit exercise dose according to FITT-VP principles and monitoring of adherence to both physical activity and technology use.

Supporting source [1]

Co-creative design and stakeholder guidance in the proposal

Building on technology acceptance models and behaviour change theories, the authors describe how user-centred and co-creative design can turn theoretical constructs into concrete digital features that support motivation, enjoyment and long-term engagement. They propose stakeholder-specific guidance for developers, researchers and clinicians on user assessment, recruitment of vulnerable groups, implementation frameworks and clinically grounded evaluation of outcomes and usability. The paper presents these as recommendations and a pragmatic roadmap, not as tested results.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. This is a position paper combining evidence and expert consensus, not a new study, and the abstract reports no tested outcomes.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Recommendations for the development, implementation, and evaluation of technology-assisted physical activity interventions to support healthy aging: insights from PhysAgeNet.

Schott N, Pelclová J, Giannouli E, Langeard A, McCrum C, Dubbeldam R, Bernardes RA, Boshnjaku A, Beckwée D. · europepmc.org · September 28, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    driven by technological possibilities rather than clinical
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    synthesizes current evidence and expert consensus
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    stakeholder-specific guidance for developers, researchers, and clinicians

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…