Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

Green space, air pollution mixture and biological aging trajectories in 11,760 Chinese adults

In a high-pollution Chinese city, more green space near home was associated with lower odds of an accelerated biological aging trajectory, while higher air pollution exposure was associated with higher odds; about a quarter of the green-space link appeared mediated by lower pollution exposure. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. The study used repeated-measures data from 11,760 adults aged 20 to 65 in a high-pollution Chinese city and identified three biological age acceleration profiles. [1]

  2. Higher green space was associated with lower odds of the accelerated aging trajectory, while higher air pollution exposure was associated with higher odds. [1]

  3. About 25.0% of the protective green-space association was mediated by reduced pollution exposure. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Observational accelerated longitudinal study using repeated measures (abstract).
Population / context
11,760 adults aged 20 to 65 years in a high-pollution Chinese city.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
September 3, 2026

Repeated measures in 11,760 adults in a high-pollution city

The study used an accelerated longitudinal design with repeated-measures data from 11,760 adults aged 20 to 65 in a high-pollution Chinese city. Biological age acceleration was derived with the Klemera-Doubal method. Group-based trajectory modeling identified three stable profiles, labeled slow, moderate and accelerated aging, which differed mainly in overall magnitude rather than in diverging slopes over age.

Supporting source [1]

Green space linked to lower, pollution to higher accelerated-aging odds

Higher green space (500 m normalized difference vegetation index) was associated with lower odds of belonging to the accelerated aging trajectory (odds ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.95). Even with limited exposure contrast in this high-pollution setting, higher exposure to PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and O3 was associated with higher odds of that trajectory. The pollution mixture showed a consistent positive association (odds ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.24), driven mainly by O3 and PM10.

Supporting source [1]

Partial mediation and abstract-only scope of the associations

A mediation analysis indicated that 25.0% of the protective association of green space was mediated by reduced pollution exposure. The authors describe these as associations and highlight green space as a resilience resource, supporting combined urban greening and pollution control; the design does not establish causation. Only the abstract was reviewed, so details of exposure assessment, follow-up length and adjustment for confounders were not available here.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

Abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The design is observational, so the reported associations do not establish causation. Exposure assessment, follow-up length and confounder adjustment are not described in the abstract.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
Associations of Green Space and Air Pollution Mixture with Heterogeneous Biological Aging Patterns.

Ma G, Xu J, Li Y, Wu Y, Li Q, Cao X, Zhao Z, Gao J, Gao L, Yan L, Zhang X. · europepmc.org · September 3, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    repeated-measures data from 11,760 adults
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    associated with lower odds of membership in
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    25.0% of the protective association of green

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…