Your topics. New publications.

A compact browser notification when there’s something new. At most once a day — no account needed.

What interests you?

Optional and switchable off here at any time. We save your selected topics and device subscription; no email address is required. Privacy

Search the harborEN/DEAccount
Biological age & clocks
Research brief

OmniAge compendium: 413 aging omic biomarkers and their correlations in blood

The OmniAge package collects 413 aging omic biomarkers in 12 categories; in large blood datasets, mitotic age was associated with clonal hematopoiesis subtypes and causal clocks, and the authors call it an exploratory tool for generating hypotheses. [1]

Automatic summary · not editorially reviewed

The key findings

  1. OmniAge is an R and Python package collecting 413 aging omic biomarkers in 12 categories. [1]

  2. In large blood datasets, mitotic age was associated with clonal hematopoiesis subtypes and causal clocks described as predictive of cancer risk. [1]

  3. Age acceleration from transcriptomic and epigenetic clocks correlated in sorted immune cell types, but this was driven by cell-type heterogeneity. [1]

The source at a glance

Study type / format
Abstract describing a biomarker software package and exploratory correlation analyses.
Population / context
Large blood datasets and sorted immune cell types analyzed with aging omic biomarkers.
Summary based on
Study abstract
Original publication
July 28, 2026

OmniAge package: 413 biomarkers in 12 categories

Interest in aging omic biomarkers has grown because they can quantify biological age. Most were derived in blood and fall into many categories, but little is known about how biomarkers from different categories correlate. The authors present OmniAge, an R and Python package with 413 aging omic biomarkers in 12 categories. These include traditional epigenetic clocks, epigenetic mitotic clocks, DNA methylation-based proxies for clonal hematopoiesis and inflammaging, causal clocks, cell-type specific epigenetic clocks and single-cell transcriptomic clocks.

Supporting source [1]

Mitotic age linked to clonal hematopoiesis in blood data

By studying inter-class correlations across large blood datasets, the authors report associations of mitotic age with clonal hematopoiesis subtypes and with causal clocks, which are described as predictive of cancer risk. Using proxies of serum protein levels, they further separated associations with mitotic clocks, clonal hematopoiesis and causal clocks into distinct biological processes mapping to key aging pathways. These are described as associations, not as evidence that one factor causes another.

Supporting source [1]

Immune cell-type heterogeneity drives clock correlation

Applying OmniAge to multi-modal data of sorted immune cell types revealed that age acceleration derived from transcriptomic and epigenetic clocks correlated, but that this correlation was driven by underlying cell-type heterogeneity. In summary, the authors describe OmniAge as an exploratory tool for evaluating large numbers of aging omic biomarkers and for aiding discovery and generating new hypotheses. The abstract does not report a validated product or a causal demonstration.

Supporting source [1]

How to interpret this

This is an abstract only; the full text was not reviewed. The reported links are associations from exploratory analyses, not causal findings, and no human lifespan or clinical benefit is reported.

Based on the study abstract; the full paper, tables and supplementary data were not reviewed.

Source & supporting passages

[1]
The OmniAge compendium of aging omic biomarkers links mitotic clocks to clonal hematopoiesis and causality.

Du Z, Ling Y, Tong H, Guo X, Teschendorff AE. · europepmc.org · July 28, 2026

Read the quoted passagesIn the language of the original source
  1. Finding 1 ↑

    a collection of 413 aging omic biomarkers
  2. Finding 2 ↑

    associations of mitotic age with clonal hematopoiesis
  3. Finding 3 ↑

    driven by underlying cell-type heterogeneity

AI-assisted summary with linked source passages. No independent editorial or clinical review.

Our editorial method

Discussion

Community discussions

0 topics

Member contributions. Share sources, disclose commercial interests, and avoid personal medical or dosing advice.

Loading…