FINGER trial: 2-year diet, exercise, cognitive training and vascular monitoring vs general health advice
Thumbnail from YouTube. Playing loads the YouTube player.
History & recommendationsOff
Keep recently viewed content on this browser. Your history stays on this device and is never sent to Harbor. Videos you play can also help order related video recommendations.
Open saved items & history →At a glance
Automatic summary · not editorially reviewedIn the FINGER trial, 1,260 adults aged 60–77 at elevated dementia risk were randomized to a 2-year multidomain program (diet, exercise, cognitive training, vascular risk monitoring) or general health advice; cognitive scores rose in both groups, more in the program group (between-group difference 0.022 per year, 95% CI 0.002–0.042). [1]
The FINGER trial randomized 1,260 adults aged 60 to 77 at elevated dementia risk but not yet impaired to a two-year multidomain program or general health advice. [1]
Cognitive scores rose in both groups, but more in the intervention group, with a between-group difference of 0.022 per year (95% CI 0.002 to 0.042). [1]
The description cites the 2015 Lancet paper by Ngandu and colleagues and labels the content educational, not medical advice. [1]
FINGER randomized at-risk adults 60–77
The description reports a 2015 Finnish randomized trial called FINGER. It enrolled 1,260 adults aged 60 to 77 who had an elevated dementia risk score but were not yet impaired. Participants were assigned either to a combined program of diet, exercise, cognitive training and vascular risk monitoring, or to general health advice. The program lasted two years. [1]
Cognitive scores rose in both groups
According to the description, cognitive scores rose in both groups, but more in the intervention group. The reported between-group difference was 0.022 per year, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.002 to 0.042. The video says it explains how large that difference really is. The description does not state which cognitive test was used or how the score was scaled. [1]
Description scope: cited paper, no outcome details
The description cites the 2015 Lancet paper by Ngandu and colleagues and frames the content as educational, not medical advice. It does not report dementia diagnoses, long-term follow-up or harms. Only the video description was available; the video and transcript were not reviewed, so details beyond the description cannot be confirmed. [1]
Context & limits
Only the video description was available; the video and transcript were not reviewed. The description gives no dementia diagnoses, long-term follow-up, harms or details of the cognitive test, and it is educational content, not medical advice.
Based on the creator’s description; the full video and transcript were not analyzed.
Quoted passages in the original language
randomized 1,260 adults aged 60 to 77
a between-group difference of 0.022 per year
EDUCATIONAL CONTENT - NOT MEDICAL ADVICE
About this video
Creator description · original textText language: English
Longevity · 14 min · Source published: 2026-10-16
Added to Harbor: 10/23/2026
Original on YouTube ↗Automatically categorized source. Creator statements are not an independent evidence review or personal medical guidance.